Allopathy vs Ayurveda
Allopathy is considered to be a fast healer and Ayurveda can be advantageous in the long term. Express your views on the same.
Started by Prateek Sengar
-
HI,
Ayurveda is considered as the best treatment for any disease as it is free from the side effects. All the medicines are made up in ayurveda consists natural herbs that are free from chemicals whereas allopathy medicines are only made up from harmful chemicals. One should always go for ayurvedic treatment rather than allopathy. -
People nowadays prefer Allopathy to Ayurveda because it gives a quick relief though affects body as after all its a chemical. In long run decreases immunity power a bit and sometimes are not any beneficial to the one who takes
Example: if anyone has a soar throat, he/she prefers to take may be D-cold or vicks instead of Ayurveda therapy but these medicines lead to strokes as they contain phenyl-propanol-amid (PPA) -
Hello Everyone,
I think it all depends on the situation and its severity because if somebody has met with an accident, Ayurveda cant help and if somebody is allergic to allopathic medicine, ayurveda can be a good choice. -
HI ALL,
Both have their own pros and cons. It is true that Ayurveda is old but it cannot only prevent but can also cure. That is different part that much of the people are not aware of its right use. Secondly the effect of ayurveda is slow and takes time but it has no side effects. On the other side for a quick relaxation Allopathy is the right choice, but then it involves side effects also. In many cases where allopathic doctors give up; ayurveda is able to heal people well and that too without operation. -
Hi,
Allopathy suppresses/inhibits your disease for the time being. Ayurveda, though its slow, gives you a permanent cure.
Taking an Exam? Selecting a College?
Get authentic answers from experts, students and alumni that you won't find anywhere else
Sign Up on ShikshaOn Shiksha, get access to
- 64k Colleges
- 966 Exams
- 618k Reviews
- 1450k Answers