Hello, I would like to know is there any difference between 1 year full time MBA in London then 2 years study of MBA in India...
All i want to know is that whether both the studies are equivalent to each other. I would also like to know that which MBA is more broader and has more scope: MBA Public Health management or MBA international healthcare management. I am from nursing field and has done PgDip healthcare management.
46 Views|Posted 2012-07-26 04:54:14
Asked by Shikha
4 Answers

Answered by
2012-07-26 14:48:35
MBA IN LONDON NEEDS THREE YEARS WORK EXPERIENCE AFTER GRADUATION, WHILE INDIAN MBA/PGDM NEEDS ONLY GRADUATION (WITH 50% MARKS IN MOST GOOD INSTITUTES) TRY IN NCR DELHI AREA-IMT OR INMANTEC ARE GOOD OPTIONS-DR K GOSWAMI

Answered by
2012-07-26 08:53:44
There is a little difference but you should go for 2 years full time MBA in India.
S
Answered by
2012-07-26 05:55:54
Not much difference, better go for some good B Schools in India
Taking an Exam? Selecting a College?
Get authentic answers from experts, students and alumni that you won't find anywhere else.
On Shiksha, get access to
66K
Colleges
|
1.2K
Exams
|
6.9L
Reviews
|
1.9M
Answers
Didn't find the answer you were looking for?
Search from Shiksha's 1 lakh+ Topics
or
Ask Current Students, Alumni & our Experts
Have a question related to your career & education?
or
See what others like you are asking & answering
