Is KLU School of Architecture, Guntur as good as Acharya Nagarjuna University?

<div>When considering the architecture courses at KL University (KLU) and Acharya Nagarjuna University (ANU) of Guntur, one will have to judge the different factors concerning which one could best serve its purpose.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Reputation and accreditation:</div><div>ANU: Stated in the year 1976, ANU is a governmental university accredited and recognised by University Grants Commission-UGC.</div><div>KLU : Founded in 1980 as a private educational institution, KL University is, too, acknowledged by UGC.</div><div>•\tANU: The B.Arch. programme under ANU features an average student rating of 3.0 out of 5, out of 4 student reviews</div><div>\t• KLU: There is a total rating of 3.6 out of 5 for B.Arch., with 1 student review.</div><div>&nbsp;Infrastructure and Facilities</div><div>•\tANU: ANU caters to a wide assortment of undergraduate courses and postgraduates in more than one course area.</div><div>• KLU: KLU is well known for its modern infrastructure and state-of-the-art facilities, which leads to a much more excellent learning environment.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Both ANU and KLU offer excellent architecture programs. KLU is slightly ahead in terms of student ratings and infrastructure. But it all depends on personal preference, specific programme details, and career goals. It would be best to visit the campuses, talk to the current students and faculty, and see the curriculum in action before making a decision.</div>

0 Upvotes 0 Upvotes 0 Downvotes

• • Report Abuse
• Comment