Which has a better scope and why: Competition Law or Real Estate / Infrastructure Law ?

Hey, I think more than the scope, the interest of individual matters for success in a particular area of law. Let's say, for example, I am interested in real estate and infrastructure law but I pursue competition law after my law school. I would not be working with that zeal or enthusiasm as compared to real estate and infrastructure law. Therefore, according to me, the interest mattes more than the scope as you can make money under any area of law and practice. But coming to the question, most of the areas of law are interlinked. Labour and employment-related things may be one of the aspects of the company. What has the better scope? I think both of these are too diverse fields and have a lot of subject matters within. Competiton law is governed by a legislation but there are several legislations for real estate and infrastructure. It is very difficult to come to a conclusion as to what area of law has a wider scope. I would go with competition law but. Although the growth of real estate industry is phenomenal, competition law has wider scope in the sense that it is not just restricted to one field but extends to competition-related issues in various sectors.

0 Upvotes 0 Upvotes 0 Downvotes

• • Report Abuse
• Comment