Which one has a better scope and why among environmental law and human rights & international humanitarian law?

Hey there, Talking of the scope and the reasons why I believe both the two fields of law have a scope in their own fields. Both, the environmental law and humanitarian law have been a cause of action, and we get to see a number of contemporary issues regarding them for eg. Rohingya crisis these days is one such instance falling within humanitarian law. Also, the smog caused by factories nearby Delhi, falls within Environmental laws. Also, there have been various known matters with regard to environment taken up by Medha Patkar, while Narmada Bachao Andolan and M.C Mehta also. Also, for humanitarian laws killing of civilians in Kashmir, surgical strikes etc. fall within the ambit of humanitarian laws. Thus, there arise a number of issues pertaining to both set of laws. Also, owing to industrialization as well as globalization, the scope of cause of action arising in both the fields is very likely. It would be a matter of choice for an individual to go for practicing in humanitarian law or environmental law and believe me you would not repent your decision of taking up either of them.

0 Upvotes 0 Upvotes 0 Downvotes

• • Report Abuse
• Comment