Why did Rutherford's Nuclear Model fail if it explained that atoms have a nucleus?
Why did Rutherford's Nuclear Model fail if it explained that atoms have a nucleus?
Rutherford's atomic model was a breakthrough, but it was flawed. It couldn't explain atomic stability, as orbiting electrons should lose energy and spiral into the nucleus. It also failed to account for the discrete line spectra observed from excited atoms.
Similar Questions for you
CH3COOH + NaOH → CH3COONa + H2O
ΔH = –50.6 kJ/mol
NaOH + SA [HCl] → NaCl + H2O
ΔH = –55.9 kJ/mol
the value of ΔH for ionisation of CH3COOH
⇒ ΔH = +55.9 – 50.6
5.3 kJ/mol
Kindly consider the solution
Fact.
Kindly go through the solution
Taking an Exam? Selecting a College?
Get authentic answers from experts, students and alumni that you won't find anywhere else.
On Shiksha, get access to
Learn more about...
Didn't find the answer you were looking for?
Search from Shiksha's 1 lakh+ Topics
Ask Current Students, Alumni & our Experts
Have a question related to your career & education?
See what others like you are asking & answering




