11.30 Light of intensity 10^–5 W m^–2 falls on a sodium photo-cell of surface area 2 cm². Assuming that the top 5 layers of sodium absorb the incident energy, estimate time required for photoelectric emission in the wave-picture of radiation. The work function for the metal is given to be about 2 eV. What is the implication of your answer?

3 Views|Posted 8 months ago

Asked by Shiksha User

1 Answer

Sort by:

Answered by

Payal Gupta | Contributor-Level 10

8 months ago

11.30 Intensity of the incident light, I = $10^{- 5}$ W $m^{- 2}$

Surface area of the sodium photocell, A = 2 ${c m}^{2}$ = 2 $* 10^{- 4} m^{2}$

The incident power of the light, P = I $* A$ = $10^{- 5}$ $* 10^{- 4} m^{2}$ W = 2 $* 10^{- 9}$ W

Work function of the metal, $\emptyset_{0}$ = 2 eV = 2 $* 1.6 * 10^{- 19}$ J = 3.2 $* 10^{- 19}$ J

Number of layers of sodium that absorbs the incident energy, n = 5

The effective atomi

Upvote

Similar Questions for you

Given below are two statements:

Statement I : Davission-Germer experiment establishes, the wave nature of electrons.

Statement II : If electrons have wave nature, they can interfere and show diffraction.

In the light of the above statements choose the correct answer from the option given below:

Raj Pandey

Based on theory

Radiation from hydrogen gas excited to first excited state is used for illuminating certain metallic plate. When the same plate is exposed to the radiation from some unknown hydrogen like gas excited to the same level it is found that de-Broglie wavelength of fastest photoelectron has decreased by 2.3 times. It is given that energy corresponding to longest wavelength of Lyman series of the unknown gas is 3 times the ionization energy of hydrogen gas (13.6eV). The work function (in eV) of the metallic plate is ______. [Take (2.3)² = 5.25]

Vishal Baghel

z² × (13.6) (1 - ¼) = 3 × (13.6)
z = 2 . (i)
h/√2mk? = (1/2.3) × h/√2mk?
=> k? = (2.3)²k? = 5.25k? (ii)
Now, k? = E? - Φ
k? = E? - Φ = z²E? - Φ
∴ k? /k? = (10.2 - Φ)/ (4 × 10.2 - Φ) = 1/5.25
=> Φ = 3eV

Vishal Baghel

$_{} \frac{}{}$ $K . E_{1} = \frac{1230}{800} - ?$ - (i)

$_{}_{} \frac{}{}$ $K . E_{2} = 2 K . E_{1} = \frac{1230}{500} - ?$ - (ii)

from (i) & (ii)

$? = 0.615$ ev

Vishal Baghel

hu = hu₀ + K.E

Cases u = 2u₀

h2u₀ = hu₀ + K.E₁

K.E₁ = hu₀

$\frac{1}{2} m v_{1}^{2} = h υ_{0}$

$v_{1}^{2} = \frac{2 h υ_{0}}{m}$

$v_{1} = \sqrt[]{\frac{2 h υ_{0}}{m}}$ - (1)

Now, cases 2

h 5u₀ = hu₀ + k.E₂

k.E₂ = 4hu₀

$\frac{1}{2} m v_{2}^{2} = 4 h υ_{0}$

v₂ = $\sqrt[]{\frac{8 h υ_{0}}{m}}$ - (2)

$\frac{v_{2}}{v_{1}} = \sqrt[]{\frac{8}{2} = 2}$

v₂ = 2v₁

Kindly consider the following

$f (x) = {\begin{matrix} \frac{2 x^{2} - 3 x + 2}{x - 2}, & x \neq 2 \\ 5, & x = 2 \end{matrix}$

Alok Kumar Singh

This is a Short Answer Type Questions as classified in NCERT Exemplar

Sol:

$\begin{array}{l} f (x) = \frac{2 x^{2} - 3 x - 2}{x - 2} \\ = \frac{2 x^{2} - 4 x + x - 2}{x - 2} = \frac{2 x (x - 2) + 1 (x - 2)}{x - 2} \\ = \frac{(2 x + 1) (x - 2)}{x - 2} = 2 x + 1 \\ \underset{x \to 2^{-}}{l i m} f (x) = 2 x + 1 = \underset{h \to 0}{l i m} 2 (2 - h) + 1 = 4 + 1 = 5 \\ \underset{x \to 2^{+}}{l i m} f (x) = 2 x + 1 = \underset{h \to 0}{l i m} 2 (2 + h) + 1 = 4 + 1 = 5 \\ \underset{x \to 2}{l i m} f (x) = 5 \\ A s \underset{x \to 2^{-}}{l i m} f (x) = \underset{x \to 2^{+}}{l i m} f (x) = \underset{x \to 2}{l i m} f (x) = 5 \\ H e n c e, f (x) i s c o n t i n u o u s a t x = 2 . \end{array}$